Thuis
Contacten

    Hoofdpagina


Famhp questionnaire on national scientific technical advice (sta)

Dovnload 104.51 Kb.

Famhp questionnaire on national scientific technical advice (sta)



Datum16.02.2019
Grootte104.51 Kb.

Dovnload 104.51 Kb.





Directorate-General

PRE-Authorisation




FAMHP QUESTIONNAIRE ON NATIONAL

SCIENTIFIC TECHNICAL ADVICE (STA)











INTRODUCTION
This questionnaire is aimed at capturing the applicant’s view on vital qualitative aspects of the national Scientific-Technical Advice (STA) issued by the Federal Agency for Medicines and Health Products (FAMHP). The qualitative feedback from applicant’s should allow the FAMHP to continuously increase it’s national Scientific-Technical Advice service in a transparent way. Nevertheless, the questionnaire can be completed on a voluntary basis.

A selected number of questions are included to gather your experience from the national STA procedures used by the FAMHP.
The questionnaire should be used for initial and follow-up STA requests submitted to the FAMHP irregardless of the applied STA procedure (i.e. Full STA or Ad Hoc STA).
Please fill out one questionnaire per STA request.
The completed questionnaire should be sent to the FAMHP. Evidently, data will be kept anonymous at all times.
Please send the completed document to the FAMHP within 1 month after national STA has been received, preferably by E-mail: sta@fagg-afmps.be or by post to the attention of Mrs. Greet Musch at the following address :

Federal Agency for Medicines and Health Products, DG PRE-Authorisation (desk 8D222), Eurostation II, Place Victor Horta 40/40, B-1060 Brussels





USER INSTRUCTIONS
Each question is to be answered electronically :
- By clicking in the appropriate box,

and/or

- By filling the empty boxes with free text answers

and/or

- By clicking and selecting in the continuous scale attached to each question/statement and indicating your level of agreement with the statement (from 1 “strongly disagree” to 5 “strongly agree”)
1 strongly disagree

2

3 medium

4

5 strongly agree
For those questions/statements that would NOT apply to the STA request of the applicant, please leave the answer boxes open.

STA procedure - format
Please tick the corresponding box(es)
Type of STA request

Initial STA request Follow-up STA request
STA procedure

Full STA request Ad Hoc STA request
STA format
in writing face-to-face meeting teleconference meeting
Area(s) of advice
Quality Preclinical Clinical
Regulatory - Technical Other (please specify in the “additional comments”

section below)


Additional comments

How many questions did you ask? (free text answer)


I. Questions related to the Quality of the provided STA
The final advice given by the FAMHP (i.e. through a discussion meeting or in writing) provided clear answers to the questions raised during the procedure. (please answer only for those areas of advice for which questions were raised):
QUALITY
1 Strongly disagree 2 3 4 5 Strongly agree
PRECLINICAL
1 Strongly disagree 2 3 4 5 Strongly agree
CLINICAL
1 Strongly disagree 2 3 4 5 Strongly agree
REGULATORY - TECHNICAL
1 Strongly disagree 2 3 4 5 Strongly agree
OTHER
1 Strongly disagree 2 3 4 5 Strongly agree

Was clarification on the final advice required?


Yes No
If yes, how many questions needed to be clarified? (free text answer)

The applicant’s request for clarification on the advice issued was adequately addressed (i.e. all lack of clarity was resolved)?


1 Strongly disagree 2 3 4 5 Strongly agree

The format of the final advice (i.e. discussion meeting or in writing) was most appropriately for addressing the questions raised during the procedure


1 Strongly disagree 2 3 4 5 Strongly agree

Additional comments



II. Questions related to the Quality of the provided STA sercice
Pre-validation & validation phase
The information provided by the FAMHP on the national STA procedures (i.e. through the FAMHP website, contact points, other communication, etc.) was adequate to prepare the formal STA submission
1 Strongly disagree 2 3 4 5 Strongly agree

The input provided by the FAMHP during the validation phase of the STA request was valuable in the course of the procedure


1 Strongly disagree 2 3 4 5 Strongly agree

The applicant agrees with the FAMHP’s decision to classify the STA request during the validation phase as a Full / Ad Hoc STA


1 Strongly disagree 2 3 4 5 Strongly agree

The duration of the validation phase was adequate


1 Strongly disagree 2 3 4 5 Strongly agree

Additional comments



Administration - Coordinator - Experts
The involvement and communication of the administrative personnel during the procedure was adequate
1 Strongly disagree 2 3 4 5 Strongly agree

The involvement and communication of the coordinator during the procedure was adequate


1 Strongly disagree 2 3 4 5 Strongly agree

Based on the received STA from internal (i.e. FAMHP) experts, the choice of experts involved by the coordinator during the procedure was adequate in terms of scientific/regulatory input


1 Strongly disagree 2 3 4 5 Strongly agree

Based on the received STA from external experts, the choice of experts involved by the coordinator during the procedure was adequate in terms of scientific/regulatory input



1 Strongly disagree 2 3 4 5 Strongly agree

Additional comments



Discussion meeting
Was a discussion meeting held?
Yes by means of : face-to-face meeting teleconference meeting

No by means of : in writing

(please go directly to part III of the questionnaire)


The organisation (eg. in terms of timing, efficiency, etc.) and communication in preparation of the discussion meeting was satisfactory
1 Strongly disagree 2 3 4 5 Strongly agree

The interaction during the discussion meeting was adequate


1 Strongly disagree 2 3 4 5 Strongly agree

The feedback interaction after the discussion meeting (eg. validation of meeting minutes) was adequate


1 Strongly disagree 2 3 4 5 Strongly agree

Additional comments




III. Questions related to the Consistency of the provided STA
Previous advice(s)
Please indicate if the applicant received previous scientific (and or regulatory) advice related to this national STA request and from which competent authority
Yes

EMEA FAMHP other NCA’s in EU non EU



No

(please go directly to the next page of the questionnaire)

The recommendations of the national STA given by the FAMHP were fully in line with the recommendations of previous advice(s) issued by the FAMHP, other NCA’s in the EU or the EMEA.
1 Strongly disagree 2 3 4 5 Strongly agree

In case previous national STA was given by the FAMHP: Have the same experts been involved in the related follow-up STA?


Yes No partially

Additional comments



Overall rating of the national STA
You are satisfied with the quality of the provided STA
1 Strongly disagree 2 3 4 5 Strongly agree

You are satisfied with the quality of the provided STA service


1 Strongly disagree 2 3 4 5 Strongly agree

You are satisfied with the consistency of the provided STA (if applicable)


1 Strongly disagree 2 3 4 5 Strongly agree

Completed by: …………………… Date : …………………..

(name) (DD/MM/YY)
Company name : …………………
Contact details : ……………….… Phone : …………………..

E-mail : ……………….… Fax : …………………..




After completion, please return this questionnaire to the FAMHP within 1 month after national STA has been received, preferably by E-mail: sta@fagg-afmps.be or by post to the attention of Mrs. Greet Musch at the following address :

Federal Agency for Medicines and Health Products, DG PRE-Authorisation (desk 8D222), Eurostation II, Place Victor Horta 40/40, B-1060 Brussels

The FAMHP thank you very much for your kind co-operation.



Federal Agency for Medecines and Health Products


Eurostation II

Place Victor Horta 40/40


1060 Brussels


www.afmps.be



  • F ederal A gency for M edecines and H ealth P roducts
  • 1060 Brussels

  • Dovnload 104.51 Kb.