Thuis
Contacten

    Hoofdpagina


Proceedings of the 14th International Congress of Phonetic Sciences

Dovnload 58.25 Kb.

Proceedings of the 14th International Congress of Phonetic Sciences



Datum10.10.2017
Grootte58.25 Kb.

Dovnload 58.25 Kb.

Prosodie





  • Adank, P. & Heuven, V.J.J.P. van (1999). Speaker normalization preserving regional accent differences in vowel quality. In NN, NN (Ed.), Proceedings of the 14th International Congress of Phonetic Sciences. (pp. 1593-1596). San Francisco: NN.

  • Altenberg, Bengt (1987). Prosodic patterns in spoken English: studies in the correlation between prosody and grammar. Lund: Lund University Press.

  • Aronoff, M. & R. Oehrle (eds.) (1984). Language sound structure. Studies in Phonology presented to Morris Halle by his teacher and students. Cambridge, MA: MIT.

  • Auer, Peter (1996). On the prosody and syntax of turn-taking. In: Couper-Kuhlen, Elizabeth & Margret Selting (eds., 1996). Prosody and conversation. Cambridge: Cambridge University: 57-100.

  • Beckman, M.E. (1986). Stress and Non-Stress Accent. Dordrecht: Foris.

  • Beckman, M.E. (1995). Local shapes and global trends. Proceedings of the 13th International Congress of the Phonetic Sciences 2: 100-107.

  • Beckman, M. E. & J. Edwards (1992). Intonational categories and the articulatory control of duration. In Y. Tohkura, E. Vatikiotis-Bateson & Y. Sagiska (eds.) Speech perception, production, and linguistic structure. Tokyo: Ohmsha.

  • Beckman, M. E. & J. Edwards (1994). Articulatory evidence for differentiating stress categories. In: Keating (1994).

  • Beckman, Mary & Janet Pierrehumbert (1986). Intonational structure in Japanese and English. Phonology Yearbook 3: 255-309.

  • * ! Beckman, M & G. Ayers (1997). Guidelines for ToBI Labelling (version 3). Ohio State University.

  • * Bezooijen, Renée van (2000). Openbare leeszalen en eventuele geluidseffecten: Voorwaartse klemtoonverschuiving in het Nederlands. In: Gillis, Steven; Nuyts, Jan & Johan Taeldeman (eds.) (2000). Met Taal om de Tuin geleid, Opstellen voor Georges de Schutter. Universitaire Instelling Antwerpen, Antwerpen: 229-239.

  • * Bezooijen, van R. (2001). Régionale omroepen, ádequate voorzieningen. Verschuift de klemtoon echt steeds vaker naar voren? Onze Taal 70/5: 104-106.

  • A Bibliography of Modern Prosody (Book Review) (1950). In: Hermathena : a series of papers on literature, science and philosophy, no. 75 (mei): 84.

  • Bolinger, D. (1965a). Forms of English: accent, morpheme, order. (I. Abe & T. Kanekiyo, eds.) Harvard University Press, Cambridge, Massachusetts.

  • Bolinger, D. (1965b). Pitch accent and sentence rhythm. In: Bolinger, D. (1965a). Forms of English: accent, morpheme, order. (I. Abe & T. Kanekiyo, eds.) Harvard University Press, Cambridge, Massachusetts.

  • Bolinger, D. (ed., 1972). Intonation. Selected readings. Penguin Books.

  • Bolinger, D. (1978). Intonation across languages. In: Greenberg, J.H. (ed.), Universals of Human Language, vol. 2: Phonology: 471-524, Stanford CA: Stanford University Press.

  • Bolinger, D. (1986). Intonation and its parts. Melody in spoken English. Stanford: Stanford UP.

  • Bolinger, D. (1989). Intonation and its uses. Melody in grammar and discourse. Stanford: Stanford UP.

  • Borchgrevink, Hans M. (1982). Prosody and Musical Rhythm are Controlled by the Speech Hemisphere, in: Clynes, Manfred (ed.), Music, Mind and Brain: The Neuropsychology of Music, Plenum Press, New York.

  • Brown, G.; Anderson, A.; Shillcock, R. & G. Yule (1984). Teaching talk: Strategies for production and assessment. Cambridge. (Map task)

  • Buning, J.E. Jurgens and Cornelis H. van Schooneveld (1961). The sentence intonation of contemporary standard Russian as a linguistic structure. Reeks: Description and analysis of contemporary standard Russian, 's-Gravenhage.

  • Byrd, D., Narayanan, S., Kaun, A., & Saltzman, E. (1997). Phrasal signatures in articulation. Proceedings of Laboratory Phonology V, Cambridge U.P., Cambridge, England.

  • Caspers, J. & Heuven, V.J.J.P. van (1995). Effects of time pressure on the choice of accent-lending and boundery-marking pitch configurations in Dutch. In Pardo, J.M., Enríquez, E., Ortega, J., Ferreiros, J., Macías, J. & Valverde, F.J. (Ed.), Proceedings of the 4th European Conference on Speech Communication and Technology. (pp. 1001-1004). Madrid: European Speech Communication Association.

  • Caspers, J., Heuven, V.J.J.P. van & Zwol, N. (1998). Experiments on the semantic contrast between the 'pointed hat' contour and the accent-lending fall in Dutch. In Bezooijen, R. van & Kager, R. (Ed.), Linguistics in the Netherlands 1998. (AVT publications, 15, pp. 65-79). Amsterdam: Benjamins.

  • Collier, R. (19..). F0 Declination: The Control of Its Setting, Resetting and Slope. …..

  • Chafe, Wallace (1992). Intonation units and prominences in English natural discourse. Proceedings of the IRCS Workshop on Prosody in Natural Speech: 41-27. Institute for Research in Cognitive Science Report No. 92-37. Philadelphia: University of Pennsylvania.

  • Chafe, Wallace (1993). Prosodic and functional units of language. In: Edwards, Jane A. & Martin D. Lampert (eds., 1993). Talking data: transcription and coding methods for language research: 33-43.

  • Coleman, H.O. (1914). Intonation and emphasis. Miscellanea Phonetica I, International Phonetics Association: 6-26. [muzikale notatie van intonatie]

  • Connell, Bruce & A. Arvaniti (eds.) (1995). Phonology and Phonetic Evidence: Papers in Laboratory Phonology IV. Cambridge: CUP.

  • Cooper, W. & J. Sorensen (1977). F0 contours at syntactic boundaries. Journal of the Acoustical Society of America 62: 683-692.

  • Cooper, William & John Sorensen, (1981). Fundamental frequency in sentence production. Heidelberg: Springer.

  • Couper-Kuhlen, Elizabeth (1993). English speech rhythm: form and function in everyday verbal interaction. Amsterdam: Benjamins.

  • Couper-Kuhlen, Elizabeth (1996). Intonation and clause combining in discourse: the case of because. Pragmatics 6.3: 389-426.

  • Couper-Kuhlen, Elizabeth (2001). Interactional prosody: high onsets in reason-for-the-call turns. Language and Society 30: 29-53.

  • Couper-Kuhlen, Elizabeth & Margret Selting (eds., 1996). Prosody and conversation. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

  • Cruttenden, Alan (1986). Intonation. Cambridge University Press.

  • Crystal, D (1969). Prosodic systems and intonation in English. Cambridge: CUP.

  • Cutler, Anne (1996). Prosody and the word-boundary problem. In: Morgan, J.L. & K. Demuth (eds., 1996). Signal to syntax. Mahwah, MJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.

  • * ! Cutler, Anne & D. Robert Ladd (eds.) (1983). Prosody: models and measurements. Heidelberg: Springer.

  • * Cutler, A., Dahan, D., van Donselaar, W. (1997). Prosody in the comprehension of spoken language: a literature review. Language and Speech, 40 (2): 141-201.

  • Darwin, C.J. & A. Donovan (1980). Perceptual studies of speech rhythm: isochrony and intonation. In: Simon, J.C. (ed., 1980). Proceedings of NATO ASI on Spoken Lnaguage Generation and Understanding. Dordrecht: Reidel.

  • Di Cristo, A. (1998). Intonation in French. In: Hirst, D. & A. Di Cristo (eds., 1998). Intonation systems. Cambridge: CUP.

  • Dilley, L., Shattuck-Hufnagel, S., & M. Ostendorf (1996). Glottalization of word-initial vowels as a function of prosodic structure. Journal of Phonetics 24: 423-444.

  • Docherty, G. J. & D. R. Ladd (1992). Papers in Laboratory Phonology 2. Gesture, Segment, Prosody. Cambridge: CUP.

  • Doorn, Jan van & Christine Sheard (2001). Fundamental frequency patterns in cerebral palsied speech. Clinical Linguistics & Phonetics, vol. 15 (7): 585-601.

  • Du Bois, John (1991). Transcription design principles for spoken discourse research. Pragmatics 1.71: 106.

  • Du Bois, John & Stephan Schuetze-Coburn (1993). Representing hierarchy: constituent structure for discourse databases. In: Edwards, Jane A. & Martin D. Lampert (eds., 1993). Talking data: Transcription and coding methods for language research. Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum: 221-260.

  • Du Bois, John; Schuetze-Coburn, Stephan; Paolino, Danae & Susanna Cumming (1993). Outline of discourse transcription. In: Edwards, Jane A. & Martin D. Lampert (eds., 1993). Talking data: Transcription and coding methods for language research. Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum: 45-89.

  • Edwards, J., M. Beckman & J. Fletcher (1992). The articulatory kinematics of final lengthening. Journal of the Acoustical Society of America 89: 369-382.

  • Erickson, Frederick (1992). They know all the lines: rhythmic organization and contextualization in a conversational listing routine. In: Auer, Peter & Aldo di Luzio (eds., 1992). The contextualization of language. Amsterdam: John Benjamins: 365-396.

  • Falk, Julia (1980). The conversational duet. Berkeley Linguistics Society 6: 507-514.

  • Fougeron C. & P. Keating (1995). Demarcating prosodic groups with articulation. Journal of the Acoustical Society of America 95: 2978-2979.

  • * Fougeron C. & P. Keating (1997). Articulatory strengthening at edges of prosodic domains. Journal of the Acoustical Society of America 101: 3728-3740.

  • Fox, Anthony (2000). Prosodic Features and Prosodic Structure. The Phonology of Suprasegmentals. Oxford University Press.

  • Fujimura, O. (1990a). Methods and goals of speech production research. Language Speech 33: 195-258.

  • Gelfer, C.E., Harris, K.S. & T. Baer (1987). Controlled Variables in Sentence Intonation. In: Layngeal Fuction in Phonation and Respiration, edited by T. Baer, C. Sasaki, & K.S. Harris (Little, Brown, Boston, MA), 422-435.

  • Gårding, Eva (1983). A generative model of intonation. In: Cutler and Ladd (1983): 11-25.

  • Gibbon, D. (1998). Intonation in German. In: Hirst, D. & A. Di Cristo (eds., 1998). Intonation systems. Cambridge: CUP.

  • * Gilbers, D. en H. de Hoop (1998). Conflicting Constraints: An introduction to Optimality Theory. Lingua 104, 1-12.

  • Goldsmith, John (1995). The handbook of Phonological Theory. Blackwell Reference.

  • Goodwin, Charles (1980). Restarts, pauses and the achievement of a state of mutual gaze at turn beginning. Sociological Inquiry 50: 272-302.

  • Günthner, Susanne (1996). The prosodic contextualization of moral work: an analysis of reproaches in ‘why’-formats. In: Couper-Kuhlen, Elizabeth & Margret Selting (eds., 1996). Prosody and conversation. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press:271-302.

  • Gussenhoven, C. (1990). Tonal association domains and the prosodic hierarchy in English. In S. Ramsaran (ed.) Studies in the Pronunciation of English. A commemorative volume in honour of A.C. Gimson. London: Routledge.

  • Gussenhoven, Carlos (1984). On the grammar and semantics of sentence accents. Dordrecht: Foris.

  • Gussenhoven, C. & T. Rietveld (1992). Intonation contours, prosodic structure and preboundary lengthening. Journal of Phonetics 20: 283-303.

  • * Gussenhoven, C. & P. van der Vliet (1998). The phonology of tone and intonation in the Dutch dialect of Venlo. Journal of Linguistics 35 (1999), 99-135.

  • * Gussenhoven, C.; Rietveld, T. & J. Terken (1999). ToDI, Transcription of Dutch Intonation, courseware. Ms., ToDI Collective.

  • Haan, J. & Heuven, V.J.J.P. van (1999). Male vs. female pitch range in Dutch questions. In nn, nn (Ed.), Proceedings of the 14th International Congress of Phonetic Sciences. (pp. 1581-1584). San Francisco: NN.

  • Haan, J. & Heuven, V.J.J.P. van (1999). Man-vrouw verschillen in de melodie van Nederlandse vraagzinnen en mededelingen [Male-female differences in the melody of Dutch questions and statements]. In NN, NN (Ed.), Bijdragen van de ANÉLA Sociolinguistiekdagen. (pp. 149-160). Lunteren: NN.

  • Halle, Morris (1989). Addendum to Prince’s “Metrical Forms”. In: Kiparsky, Paul & Gilbert Youmans (eds.) (1989). Phonetics and phonology 1: Rhythm and Meter: 81-86.

  • Helasvuo, Marja-Liisa (to appear). When discourse becomes syntax: Noun phrases and clauses as emergent syntactic units in Finnish conversational discourse. Amsterdam: Benjamins.

  • 't Hart, J., R. Collier & A.Cohen (1990). A perceptual study of intonation. An experimental-phonetic approach to speech melody. Cambridge: CUP.

  • Helsloot, K. (1995). Metrical Prosody. HIL dissertation 16.

  • * Helsloot, K. & B. Streefkerk (1998). Perceived prominence and the metrical-prosodic structure of Dutch sentences. Proceedings of the Institute of Phonetic Sciences of the University of Amsterdam 22: 97-114.

  • Heuven, V.J.J.P. van & Donzel, M. van (1995). Structural conditioning and phonetic implementation of Dutch stress retraction. In NN, NN (Ed.), Proceedings of the Thirteenth Congress of Phonetic Sciences. (pp. 638-641). Stockholm: NN.

  • Heuven, V.J.J.P. van & Gooskens, R.H.J.M. (1995). Declination in Dutch and Danish. In NN, NN (Ed.), Proceedings of the Thirteenth Congress of Phonetic Sciences. (pp. 374-377). _ NN.

  • Heuven, V.J.J.P. van & Haan, J. (1999). Phonetic correlates of sentence type in Dutch: statement, question and command. In Terken, J.M.B. & Swerts, M. (Ed.), Proceedings of the ESCA Workshop on DIalogue and Prosody. (pp. 35-40). Veldhoven: NN.

  • Heuven, V.J.J.P. van & Haan, J. de (2000). When and how doe we hear whether a Dutch speech utterance of a statement or a declarative question? In Hoop, H. de & Wouden, T. van der (Ed.), Linguistics in the Netherlands 2000. (AVT Publications, 17, pp. 93-104). Amsterdam/Philadelphia: John Benjamins.

  • Heuven, V.J.J.P. van & Jongenburger, W. (1995). The role of linguistic stress in the time course of word recognition in stress-accent languages. In NN, NN (Ed.), Proceedings of Eurospeech 1995. (pp. 1695-1698). _ NN.

  • Heuven, V.J.J.P. van & Kirsner, R.S. (1996). Boundary tones and the semantics of the Dutch final particles hè, hoor, zeg and joh. In Dikken, M. den & Cremers, C. (Ed.), Linguistics in the Netherlands 1996. (pp. 133-146). Amsterdam: John Benjamins.

  • Heuven, V.J.J.P. van & Kirsner, R.S. (1999). Interaction of grammatical form and intonation: two experiments on Dutch imperatives. In Bezooijen, R. van & Kager, R. (Ed.), Linguistics in the Netherlands 1999. (pp. 81-96). Amsterdam/Philadelphia: Benjamins.

  • Heuven, V.J.J.P. van & Leyden, K. van (1996). Lexical stress and spoken word recognition, Dutch versus English. In Dikken, M. den & Cremers, C. (Ed.), Linguistics in the Netherlands 1996. (pp. 159-170). Amsterdam: John Benjamins.

  • Heuven, V.J.J.P. van & Sluijter, A.M.C. (1995). Effects of focus distribution, pitch accent and lexical stress on the temporal organisation of syllables in Dutch. Phonetica, 55, 71-89.
    Heuven, V.J.J.P. van & Sluijter, A.M.C. (1995). Intensity and vocal effort as cues in the perception of linguistic stress. In NN, NN (Ed.), Proceedings of Eurospeech 1995. (pp. 941-944). _ NN.

  • Heuven, V.J.J.P. van & Sluijter, A.M.C. (1996). Acoustic correlates of stress and accent in Dutch and American English. In NN, NN (Ed.), Proceedings of the International Congress of Spoken Language Processing. Philadelphia: NN.

  • Heuven, V.J.J.P. van & Sluijter, A.M.C. (1996). Notes on the phonetics of word prosody. In Goedemans, R., Hulst, H. van der & Visch, E. (Eds. 1996). Stress patterns of the world, part 1: background. (HIL Publications, 2, pp. 233-269). The Hague: Holland Academic Graphics.

  • Heuven, V.J.J.P. van & Sluijter, A.M.C. (1996). Spectral balance as an acoustic correlate of linguistic stress. Journal of the Acoustical Society of America, 100, 2471-2485.

  • Heuven, V.J.J.P. van (1998). Effects of focus distribution and accentuation on the temporal and melodic organisation of word groups in Dutch. In Barbiers, S., Rooryck, J. & Weijer, J. van de (Ed.), Small words in the big picture. (HIL Occasional Papers, 2, pp. 37-42). Leiden: HIL.

  • Heuven, V.J.J.P. van (2000). Phonetic correlates of statement versus question intonation in Dutch. In Botinis, A. (Ed.), Intonation, analysis, modelling and technology. (Text, speech and language technology, 15: 119-143). Dordrecht/Boston/London: Kluwer Academic Publishers.

  • Heuven, V.J.J.P. van, Haan, J. & Pacilly, J.J.A. (1998). Global and local characteristics of Dutch questions in play-acted and spontaneous speech. In NN, NN (Ed.), Proceedings of an ESCA workshop on sound patterns of spontaneous speech. (pp. 139-142). La Baume-les-Aix: NN.

  • Heuven, V.J.J.P. van, Sluijter, A.M.C., Shattuck-Hufnagel, S. & Stevens, K.N. (1995). Supralaryngeal resonance and glottal pulse shape as correlates of prosodic stress and accent in American English. In NN, NN (Ed.), Proceedings of the Thirteenth Congress of Phonetic Sciences. (pp. 630-633). _ NN.

  • Hirst, Daniel (1983). Interpreting intonation: a modular approach. Journal of Semantics,: 171-181.

  • Hirst, D. & A. Di Cristo (eds., 1998). Intonation systems. Cambridge: CUP.

  • Hyde, Brett (2001). Metrical and Prosodic Structure in Optimality Theory. Dissertation, State University of New Jersey.

  • Imbert, Pierre (1985). L’intonation des phrases clivées en français: essai d’interprétation phonologique. Doctarat de 3e cycle, Université de Provence.

  • Iwasaki, Shoichi (to appear). The structure of the intonation unit in Japanese. In: Choi, Soonja (ed.). Japanese and Korean Linguistics, vol. III. Stanford: Center for the study of language and information.

  • Iwasaki, Shoichi & Hongyin Tao (1993). A comparative study of the structure of the intonation unit in English, Japanese, and Mandarin Chinese. Paper presented at the annual meeting of the Linguistic Society of America. January, 1993.

  • Kager, René (2000). Stem Stress and Peak Correspondence in Dutch. In: Dekkers, Joost; Leeuw, Frank van der & Jeroen van de Weijer (eds., 2000). Optimality Theory, Phonology, Syntax, and Acquisition. Oxford University Press: 121-151.

  • Keating, P. (ed.) (1994). Phonological Structure and Phonetic Form: Papers in Laboratory Phonology III. Cambridge: CUP.

  • * Keijsper, C.E. (1984). Vorm en betekenis in Nederlandse toonhoogtecontouren I. Forum der Letteren 25, 1: 20-37.

  • Kingston, J. & M. E. Beckman (eds.) (1990). Papers in Laboratory Phonology I. Between the Grammar and Physics of Speech. Cambridge: CUP.

  • Klatt, D. (1975). Vowel lengthening is syntactically determined in a connected discourse. Journal of Phonetics 3: 129-140.

  • Kraayeveld, Hans (Johannes) (1997). Idiosyncrasy in Prosody. Speaker and speaker group identification in Dutch using melodic and temporal information. Doctoral thesis, Nijmegen University.

  • Krahmer, Emiel (2001). Prosody and meaning: two case studies. Handout Colloquium Groningen.

  • * Kruyt, J.G. (1985). Accents from speakers to listeners. An experimental study of the production and perception of accent patterns in Dutch. Doctoral thesis, Leiden University. Foris Publications, Dordrecht.

  • Kubozono, H (1989). The mora and syllable structure in Japanese: evidence from speech errors. Language and Speech, 25: 175-183.

  • * Ladd, D.R. (1981). On intonational universals. In: Myers, T., Laver, J. & J. Anderson (eds.) The cognitive representation of speech. North-Holland Publishing Company: 389-397.

  • * ! Ladd, D. Robert (1983). Peak Features and Overall Slope. In Cutler, Anne & D. Robert Ladd (eds.) (1983). Prosody: models and measurements. Heidelberg: Springer.

  • Ladd, D.R. (1984). Declination: A review and some hypotheses. Yearbook of Phonology 1: 53-74.

  • * Ladd, D. R. (1986). Intonational phrasing: the case for recursive prosodic structure. Yearbook of Phonology 3: 311-340.

  • * Ladd, D.R. (1988). Declination “reset” and the hierarchical organisation of utterances. Journal of the Acoustical Society of America 84: 530-544.

  • * Ladd, D. R. (1990). Metrical representation of pitch register. In: Kingston & Beckman (1990).

  • Ladd, R. (1996). Intonational Phonology. Cambridge Studies in Linguistics 79, Cambridge University Press.

  • Ladd, D. Robert & N. Campbell (1991). Theories of Prosodic Structure: Evidence from syllable Duration. Proceedings of the XIIth International Congress of the Phonetic Sciences, Aix-en-Provence, France.

  • Ladd, D. R. & C. Johnson (1987). 'Metrical' factors in the scaling of sentence-initial accent peaks. Phonetica 44: 238-245.

  • Lehiste, I. (1983). The role of prosody in the internal structuring of a sentence. Proceedings of the 13th International Congress of Linguists. Tokyo: Gakushuin University.

  • Liberman, M. (1975). The Intonational System of English. Garland Publishing, Inc., New York & London.

  • Lieberman, Philip (1967). Intonation, Perception, and Language, Research Monograph No. 38, The MIT Press, Cambridge.

  • * Lindblom (1978). Final lengthening in Speech and music. In E. Gårding, G. Bruce & R. Bannert (eds.) Nordic Prosody: Papers from a symposium. Lund: Lund University Linguistics Dept.

  • Local, John & John Kelly (1986). Projection and ‘silences’: notes on phonetic and conversational structure. Human Studies 9: 185-204.

  • Local, John; Wells, Bill & M. Sebba (1985). Phonology for conversation: phonetic aspects of turn delimitation in London Jamaican. Journal of pragmatics 9: 309-330.

  • Maeda, Shinji (1976). A characterization of American English intonation. PhD dissertation, MIT.

  • Matsumoto, Kazuko (2000). Japanese intonation units and syntactic structure. Studies in Language 24-3:

  • McSweeny, Jane L. & Lawrence D. Shriberg (2001). Clinical research with the prosody-voice screening profile. Clinical Linguistics & Phonetics, vol. 15 (7): 505-528.

  • Morton, J.; Marcus, S. M.; & C.R. Frankish (1976). Perceptual centers (P-centers). Psychological Review, 83: 405-408.

  • * ! Nespor, M. & I. Vogel (1986). Prosodic Phonology. Dordrecht: Foris.

  • Odé, C., Ebing, E.F. & Heuven, V.J.J.P. van (1995). Formal and functional evaluation of a melodic model for Standard Indonesian. In NN, NN (Ed.), Proceedings of the Thirteenth Congress of Phonetic Sciences. (pp. 650-653). Stockholm: NN.

  • * Ohala, John J. (1983). Cross-Language Use of Pitch: An Ethological View. Phonetica 40: 1-18.

  • * Ohala, John J. (1984). An Ethological Perspective on Common Cross-Language Utilization of F0 of Voice. Phonetica 41: 1-16.

  • Ohala, John J. (1995). Phonetic explanations for sound patterns: implications for grammars of competence. Proceedings of the 13th International Congress of the Phonetic Sciences.

  • O'Halpin, Rosemary (2001). Intonation issues in the speech of hearing impaired children: analysis, transcription and remediation. Clinical Linguistics & Phonetics, vol. 15 (7): 529- 550.

  • Oller, D.K. (1973). The effect of position in utterance on speech segment duration in English. Journal of the Acoustical Society of America 54: 1235-1247.

  • * Ouden, D.B. den (1998?). De fonologische frase in een model voor spraakproductie. TABU 27?: 28-47.

  • Otake, Takashi; Hatano, Giyoo; Cutler, Anne & Jacques Mehler (1993). Mora or Syllable? Speech Segmentation in Japanese. Journal of memory and language, vol. 32: 258 .

  • Penner, Heike; Miller, Nicholas; Hertrich, Ingo; Ackermann, Hermann & Friedrich Schumm (2001). Dysprosody in Parkinson's disease: an investigation of intonation patterns. Clinical Linguistics & Phonetics, vol. 15 (7): 551-566.

  • Pierrehumbert, J. (1980). The phonology and phonetics of English intonation. PhD dissertation, MIT.

  • Pierrehumbert, J. (1990). Phonological and phonetic representation. Journal of Phonetics 18: 375-394.

  • Pierrehumbert, J. & J. Hirschberg (1990). The meaning of intonational contours in the interpretation of discourse. In: P. Cohen, J. Morgan & M. Pollack (eds.), Intentions in Communication, Cambridge, Mass.: MIT Press.

  • Pollak, H.W. (1911). Zur Schlukadenz im deutschen Aussagesatz. Phonetische Untersuchungen I, Vienna.

  • Price, P.J.; Ostendorf, M.,; Shattuck-Hufnagel, S. & C. Fong (1991). The use of prosody in syntactic disambiguation. Journal of the Acoustical Society of America 90: 2956-2970.

  • * ! Prince, Alan (1989). Metrical Forms. In: Kiparsky, Paul & Gilbert Youmans (eds.) (1989). Phonetics and phonology 1: Rhythm and Meter: 45-80.

  • * Prince, A. and P. Smolensky (1993). Optimality Theory: constraint interaction in generative grammar. Ms., (Rutgers Optimality Archive).

  • Remijsen, A.C. & Heuven, V.J.J.P. van (1999). Gradient and categorical pitch dimensions in Dutch: diagnostic test. In NN, NN (Ed.), Proceedings of the 14th International Congress of Phonetic Sciences. (pp. 1865-1868). San Francisco: NN.

  • Schachter, Paul & Victoria Fromkin (1968). A phonology of Akan: Akuapem, Asante and Fante. UCLA Working Papers in Phonetics, 9.

  • Schirmer, A.; Alter, K.; Kotz, A.S. & A.D. Friederici (????). Lateralisierung von Prosodie bei der Sprachproduktion: Eine Läsionsstudie. Max-Planck-Institut für neuropsychologische Forschung Leipzig. [Abstract at: http://www.uni-leipzig.de/~tk/jahrb/2000/forschung/index.html#schirmer].

  • Schuetze-Coburn, Stephan (to appear). Prosody, grammar, and discourse pragmatics: organizational principles of information flow in German conversational narratives. Amsterdam: Benjamins.

  • Selkirk, E. (1978). On prosodic structure and its relation to syntactic structure. In: T. Fretheim (ed.) Nordic Prosody II. Trondheim: TAPIR.

  • * Selkirk, E.O. (1980). The role of prosodic categories in English word stress. Linguistic Inquiry 11: 563-605.

  • * ! Selkirk, E. (1984). Phonology and Syntax: The Relation Between Sound and Structure. Cambridge, Mass.: MIT Press.

  • Selkirk, E. (1990). On the nature of prosodic constituency: comments on Beckman and Edward’s paper. In: Kingston & Beckman (1990).

  • * Selkirk, E. (1995a). Sentence prosody: Intonation, stress, and phrasing. In: Goldsmith, John (1995). The handbook of Phonological Theory. Blackwell Reference.

  • Selkirk, E.O. (1995b). The prosodic structure of function words. In Beckman, J., Walsh Dickey, L. & S. Urbanczyk (eds.) (1995). University of Massachusetts Occasional Papers in Linguistics 18: Papers in Optimality Theory. Amherst, MA: Graduate Linguistic Student Association: 439-469.

  • Selkirk, E.O. (2000??). The prosodic structure of function words. In: Martin, J. & K. Demuth (eds.), International Conference on Bootstrapping from Speech to Grammar in Early Acquisition, Brown University, Providence RI, Hillsdale N.J.: Lawrence Erlbaum.

  • Selting, Margret (1992) Prosody in conversational questions. Journal of pragmatics 17: 315-245.

  • Selting, Margret (1996). On the interplay of syntax and prosody in the constitution of turn-constructional units and turns in conversation. Pragmatics 6.3: 371-388.

  • Selting, Margret (1996). Prosody as an activity-type distinctive cue in conversation: the case of so-called ‘astonished’ questions in repair initiation. In: Couper-Kuhlen, Elizabeth & Margret Selting (eds., 1996). Prosody and conversation. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press: 231-270.

  • Selting, Margret (1998). TCUs and TRPs: the construction of units in conversational talk. Konstanz: InLiST 4.

  • Selting, Margret (2000). The construction of units in conversational talk. Language in Society.

  • Shattuck-Hufnagel, S., & A. Turk (1996). A prosody tutorial for investigators of auditory sentence processing. Journal of Psycholinguistic Research 25 (2): 193-247.

  • Silva-Corvalán, Carmen (1983). On the interaction of word order and intonation: some OV constructions in Spanish. In: Klein-Andreu, Flora (ed., (1983). Discourse perspectives on syntax. New York: Academic Press: 117-142.

  • Silverman, K., Beckman, M. Pitrelli, J., Ostendorf, M., Wightman, C., Price, P., Pierrehumbert, J., & J. Hirschberg (1992). TOBI: A Standard for Labeling English Prosody. 1992 International Conference on Spoken Language Processing, edited by J.J. Ohala, T.M. Neary, B.L. Derwing, M.M. Hodge, & G.E. Wiebe (University of Alberta, Edmonton, Canada), Vol. 2: 867-870.

  • Snow, David (2001). Imitation of intonation contours by children with normal and disordered language development. Clinical Linguistics & Phonetics, vol. 15 (7): 567-584.

  • Stolcke, A.; Shriberg, E.; Bates, R.; Ostendorf, M.; Hakkani, D.; Plauche, M.; Tur, G. & Y. Lu (1998). Automatic Detection of Sentence Boundaries and Disfluencies Based on Recognized Words. Proceedings of the International Conference on Spoken Language Processing, Vol. 5: 2247-2250, Sydney, Australia.

  • Swerts, M. (1997). Prosodic features at discourse boundaries of different strengths. Journal of the Acoustical Society of America 101: 514-521.

  • Swerts, M. & R. Geluykens (1993). The prosody of information units in spontaneous monologue. Phonetica 50: 189-196.

  • Tao, Hongyin (1992). NP intonation units and referent indentification. BLS 18: 237-247.

  • Tao, Hongyin (1996). Units in Mandarin conversation: prosody, discourse and grammar. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.

  • Terken, J.M.B. (1985). Use and function of accentuation. Some experiments. Doctoral thesis, Leiden University.

  • * Thorsen, N.G. (1984). Intonation and text in Standard Danish. Journal of the Acoustical Society of America 77: 1205-1216.

  • * Thorsen, N.G. (1986). Sentence Intonation in textual context- Supplementary data. Journal of the Acoustical Society of America 80: 1041-1047.

  • * ! Vaissière, Jacqueline (1983). Language-Independent Prosodic Features. In Cutler, Anne & D. Robert Ladd (eds.) (1983). Prosody: models and measurements. Heidelberg: Springer.

  • Wang, Michelle & Julia Hirschberg (1992). Automatic Classification of Intonational Phrase Boundaries. Computer Speech and Language, 6: 175-196.

  • Wells, Bill & Sarah Macfarlane (1998). Prosody as an interactional resourse: turn-projection and overlap. Language and speech 41.3-4: 265-294.

  • Weingart, M. (1945). Etude du langage parlé suivi du point de vue musical avec considération particulière du Tchèque. Traveaux du Cercle linguistique de Copenhague, i: 172.

  • Wennerstrom, Ann K. (2001). The music of everyday speech: prosody and discourse analysis. New York : Oxford University Press.

  • Wightman, Colin W.; Shattuck-Hufnagel, Stefanie; Ostendorf, Mari & Patti J. Price (1992). Segmental durations in the vicinity of prosodic phrase boundaries. Journal of the Acoustical Society of America 91 (3): 1707-1717.



http://www.let.rug.nl/~schreudr/


Dovnload 58.25 Kb.